Total Pageviews

Tuesday, 20 September 2016

NSW STATE GOVT ATTEMPTS TO EVICT 4000 PUBLIC TENANTS !!


An excellent article by Jed Smith at news.com

Too many newspaper articles are purposely whitewashing, ignoring or downplaying what is an ongoing and burgeoning Human Rights issue happening right here in our own backyard...the attack on the rights of public tenants and the media's stereotyping and demonising of our communities which distracts people from what is really going on and the driving force behind it - greed and a ruthless disregard for the housing rights of low-income people.

Here is a great article with quotes from professors in Urban Planning and academics.



Building a monoculture: what cities are we creating for the future?


What will our future cities look like? You can expect more density, and more problems.

AUSTRALIAN cities are becoming segregated along lines of wealth as powerful “self-interest” groups override commonsense and drive the country towards American­-style “ghettos” of rich and poor. That is the opinion of leading Academics from the University of NSW and Sydney who also say Australia is setting itself up for “negative outcomes” with its city­ planning and government policy.
“When you start putting yourself into ghettos, either rich, poor or middle class, you start to lose touch with each other... I think that’s where we’re going; a much more compartmentalised city which will have negative outcomes,” said Professor Bill Randolph, director of the City Futures at UNSW, speaking specifically about Sydney.

His criticisms were not confined to the harbour city, however. Prof Randolph had similar concerns for Melbourne, which he said had “pushed out” poor people from the inner city.
“Low income folks have been pushed out. They don’t move, they get pushed or they get replaced. The inner city has become gentrified and that is a big issue for Sydney and Melbourne,” he says.

Public housing is being pushed to the fringes of the cities.
 
Inner city Sydney is in the midst of one of the most aggressive gentrification programs in the world right now as the Baird State Government attempts to evict 4000 public housing tenants, and several prosperous businesses, to make way for a glut of high-rise apartments. The plans aim to pack 70,000 people per square kilometre into the inner city, creating a housing density only seen in pockets of New York and Hong Kong, and three times that of the nation’s second highest density suburb, Pyrmont.

Meanwhile, there has been no mention of replacing the public and affordable housing in the plans released by the government so far.

“Once you get rid of public housing you’ve got nothing left for low income people to live in and I think that is a very regrettable issue,” says Prof Randolph. “Other cities, you look at New York and they are still building affordable housing in the inner city, London is the same. Going back to our property development issue, it’s develop or perish. It doesn’t really matter about the people who get displaced.”

The future of affordable and low­ income housing in NSW, according to plans released by the state government so far, will see it built in the city’s distant fringes where youth unemployment rates are already the highest in the state, and where commutes to work can blow out to two hours one way. But as UNSW professor of Housing Research and Policy, Hal Pawson points out, even that is no certainty.

What culture do we create when we have only two types of dwellings?

“It would be very, very interesting to be able to analyse the quite significant building program the State Government says it is undertaking on the back of the Miller’s Point capital receipts,” he says, referring to the sell­-off of the inner city harbourside public housing community at Miller’s Point, “but we actually don’t know enough about what is being built and where,” he says.

“If this produces a significant net increase in public housing then three cheers for that. But if these new homes are mainly being built in remote suburbs, that’s far from ideal for people who specially need to be close to jobs and services to get their lives back on track.”

As our major cities are rebuilt and thousands are displaced, the job opportunities are not moving with them.

“What’s driving a lot of this (is) jobs that are being created are being created in our cities.
They are not widely distributed around the country anymore. Economic activity is concentrated in our central cities, so the good jobs are in central cities now. A few years ago they were much more widely spread,” says Professor Randolph. “So there is a huge pressure cooker in a sense building up in our cities.”

As the resource boom has faded, Australia’s economy has been forced to lean on a construction and property boom for support.

A boom in apartment buildings around the nation has been responsible for a fifth of Australia’s economic growth over the past two years. A push that has been fuelled by a six billion dollar contribution from China, along with other foreign investors, to the Australian property market. Some of whom have used sophisticated trust structures to get around foreign investment laws.
The Abbott government, who oversaw the peak of the boom, failed to rein in the runaway housing market. Instead he encouraged it, despite persistent complaints over housing affordability in the nation’s major cities. Today it has left us with some of the least affordable housing on earth ­ particularly in Sydney where house prices are now 12 times the average annual wage, up from five times in 1975.

Public housing is being pushed into areas where there is already high youth unemployment.

­
“The problem is we’re essentially sleepwalking our way to very unequal cities and unless
we do something about it soon it might be too late,” agrees Sydney University Urban
Planning Professor Peter Phibbs.

“We’ve taken our eye off looking out for people on low to moderate incomes and we’re basically just pandering to an elite, and I think that’s a risk. Do we want a fair city, do we
want an equal city, or do we just want a city where people talk about how much money they made off their million dollar apartment?” he said.

The political process surrounding the development of our cities has been plagued by controversy and corruption. Poor governance has resulted in powerful “self-­interest”groups having a direct influence over the political decision making process, says Prof Randolph.

“Over­-governed in many ways our cities are, but not adequately governed. That’s a real critical issue. It also allows pressure groups and self-interest groups to become very powerful in terms of who they are able to influence,” he says, pinpointing the property development sector, which, a recent enquiry by the Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC) found had made unlawful donations to nine current and former members of the Liberal Party.

“Most people would probably recognise the (property) development lobby is a very forceful and very assertive lobby. It’s able to lobby state government directly and does that very effectively. There are (other) powerful interest groups ­ the clubs and hotel industry has very strong political links and uses that very effectively. It does create an atmosphere where powerful interest groups are able to assert significant impact on critical decisions,” he says.

Critical decisions, which Prof Randolph says, are made “based on what is in the best interest for their members.” What is good for property developers, however, is not necessarily good for the rest of us when it comes to the future of our cities. Australian cities are moving away from their traditionally egalitarian, diverse roots toward a segregated “monoculture” not unlike America.

Blocks of flats are only built for one reason: it’s a revenue model.

“You build housing estates for one type of person. You build blocks of flats for one type of
person. And that’s why you get ­very much a monoculture coming out,” he says.
“What drives blocks of flats? It’s the financial system. It’s a business model. You put a lot of money into the development, banks love it, and they sell it to investors. So you’ve got a business model that is creating a certain outcome and I think we have to step back and say, well what does this mean long-term? Is this actually the society we want to create?

And I don’t think those questions get asked in the rush forward,” Prof Randolph says.

As Australia exits one of its greatest periods of prosperity, our city’s are being rebuilt and
remoulded away from what made the country great.

“I think there’s some potential problems in the way we’re approaching what’s happening in our cities. We’ve got two gangs on hand: it’s either a block of flats or a big house in the suburbs. Where are the terrace houses? Where are the villas and townhouses that people actually like to live in? The Grattan Report a couple of years ago showed that people want a variety of house types. I don’t think we are delivering that.

“Increasingly as the city splits itself up basically along income and wealth lines, that variety is being squeezed out of the system. So you won’t get a mix of old people, young people and children, families. It will become much more ‘monocultural blocks’ if you like around the city and I think Australia is going to lose something there which you may well regret down the track,” he says. ­

- Follow Jed Smith on Twitter @Jed_J_Smith



Saturday, 10 September 2016

COUNCIL ELECTIONS IN OCTOBER












Council elections in Victoria are coming up!

The loss of public housing via covert stock transfers has been going on for years,
under the radar, and unreported by the media.

Community Housing Organisations ( also sometimes called 'social housing' ) now own and or manage over 18,000 properties in Victoria.

Yet homelessness is getting worse !! 
It doesn't seem to be working does it?

That's because the criteria- allocation, rent setting and eligibility- are very different to Public Housing once Community Housing own the properties.

Keep in mind that Community Housing Federation in its Victorian budget submission are calling for the titles of 12,000 publicly owned properties to be given to them.

We predict that if that goes ahead, there will be a whole lot more homelessness to contend with.

You may be unaware that there has been serious resistance to the privatisation of public housing at the local Council level, as well as from Victorian Trades Hall Council.

Although public housing is primarily a state responsibility, it is also directed and co-ordinated federally. And local Councils that are staunch in defending public housing and protecting the rights of public tenants - thereby opposing gentrification and displacement - can also play a strong role in saving it.

The practice of using the definition 'social housing' to both 'community housing' and 'public housing' is deliberately confusing and completely inaccurate.

This clever use of obfuscating language is one way that the privatisation of public housing is being facilitated without the public being fully aware of it. Those in the know, understand full well the differences, as the resolutions below indicate.

City of Yarra has a very high density of public housing and is a progressive council.
On 5.6.2012 Yarra Council unanimously resolved that:

 'Yarra Council opposes any compulsory transfer of ownership of existing public housing, or management of public housing in the City of Yarra to Housing Associations.'

The resolution goes on to vote for security of tenure and capped rents in public housing
and an increase in public housing.

Trades Hall Council's  resolution -
Trades Hall Council opposes any transfer of public housing stock to the private sector.
Trades Hall Council calls on State and Federal governments to increase the availability of public housing to meet the needs of Victorians.
Trades Hall Council opposes rent increases above the current public housing cap of 25% of income 
and any loss of security of tenure.

Moreland Council followed suit. Moreland Council unanimously resolved against the transfer of public housing stock to Housing Associations.

An interview with Sue Bolton, Moreland Councillor, states that "Bolton worked with the Greens councillor Lenka Thompson to get a unanimous vote by the council to oppose the sell-off of public housing, oppose the transfer of public housing to housing associations, and investigate the setting up of a land trust for low-cost housing."

On 13.4.2016, Moreland Council passed a motion to write to Martin Foley, Vic Minister for Housing calling on him to 'immediately transfer the compulsory-purchased properties from the East West Link Project homes to public housing stock'

The motion is clear that the properties become public housing stock - not given away to 'community housing businesses'. The language is free from the double-speak of 'social housing'.

Friends of Public Housing Vic will be contacting contenders for Council elections, regarding their position on these resolutions.

Public tenants are also busy contacting their local Council representatives in Braybrook, Maidstone and Sunshine areas.

These public tenants are also collecting signatures for a petition. The petition is to inform Housing Minister Martin Foley that public tenants do not want any further destruction, sell-offs or transfers of public housing.

Those living in the Western suburbs are already battling with poverty, food insecurity, lack of housing affordability and homelessness.

Sources.

http://www.chfv.org.au/database-files/view-file/?id=6178
http://www.moreland.vic.gov.au/about-council/council-and-committee-meetings/council-meetings/council-meeting-minutes.html

 Many thanks to FOPHV members Howard Marosi and the late Doug Jordan, for their work with Trades Hall Council on the issue of the privatisation of public housing. Thanks to Dee, Kim and Braybrook/Maidstone Neighbourhood House.






Wednesday, 7 September 2016

AT THE COAL-FACE...

OUTSOURCING

The government seems determined to outsource many of its services on the grounds that the private sector, "not-for-profits" (which can be large organisations, most certainly profit driven), and church-based organisations can do it better.

All the public hears is PR on how great everything is.

Following is a short testimony from a staff member, working on the coal face, who is very unhappy about the changes.

The most valuable resource in these fields is experienced and dedicated staff. Many of them have worked happily for years in organisations with an underpinning philosophy which they agree with, only to find that all this is under attack now by neoliberal dogma.

When good staff leave, they take with them professionalism, the history of the organisation, and the intellectual knowledge of how the sector works in order to achieve the best outcomes. Often the staff that do stay on in the present political climate are forced to become desensitised in order to cope.

Staff should feel free to express to Management the levels of stress and frustration they feel when they are constantly dealing with people in crisis. In the story below, this has not been the case.

Neoliberal business-model thinking is often inappropriate when applied to the complex area of human services.

The following terms are found in so many documents: Key Performance Indicators (KPIs), Corporate Governance, Managerialism, "Business Intelligence" (BI), "Incentivisation" of clients, not to mention the "latest research" findings to be implemented on the next batch of unfortunate guinea-pig clients. These findings are often nothing new at all, and cyclical because every five years they come up with something else.

Whatever happened to common sense, compassion and genuine consultation?

So here is one worker's story which I've been told will surely strike a chord with many who work in the industry. I hope so, since one aim of this blog is to allow people's voices to be heard and to bring the human stories and perspectives into discussions on the housing crisis.

**********

"I work for a church based service provider. We deal with homelessness and youth at risk. Management is always sucking up to DHHS - always after more funding - many hundreds of thousands of dollars.

Now we are having to take on more and more difficult young people. I'm talking about very volatile, very damaged young people with severe behavioural problems. Suicide risk, violence, self-harming, drug abuse (especially Ice) - these are issues which staff have to deal with on a daily basis.

DHHS has to cover themselves, so there are heaps of boxes to tick - best practice, procedures, et al. But it's only tokenism. I don't think Management gives a stuff.

In the end it's all down to us - the staff. Now we have to be clinical psychologists, drug and alcohol workers, and prison guards combined!

When we complain to Management about our changing job description and unacceptable levels of stress, we just get slapped down. They say we are not working hard enough or smart enough. We are told if we don't like it we can leave.  

It is the system which is at fault, but if anything goes terribly wrong, it will be the poor worker who carries the can and gets the blame.

I used to love my job and I was good at it. Now I can't wait to get out. I am already looking for other employment.

By the way, Management is paranoid - they check our Facebook pages to see if we are criticising them."






Tuesday, 23 August 2016

A RETURN TO FAIRNESS AND DECENCY IN QUEENSLAND.

 

MORE ON QUEENSLAND -
FOLLOWING THE LANDMARK DECISION TO REJECT
THE PRIVATISATION OF PUBLIC HOUSING

Public housing is the last stop. 
Being evicted from public housing leads to homelessness.

Here are some extracts from the Estimates Hearings Committee with some brief comments added. https://www.parliament.qld.gov.au/…/2016_07_20_EstimatesIPC
                                  See p87 onwards

On SOCIAL INCLUSION
 
Mick de Brenni QLD - ALP State Minister for Housing.

“I am very pleased for the opportunity to discuss the progress in the development of a new housing strategy for all Queenslanders.

I start by indicating that the previous governments housing strategy was solely focused on the privatisation of publicly owned housing assets.

This governments housing strategy will be focused on providing more sustainable communities, more sustainable homes, more affordable homes and a more responsive housing system for every Queenslander, regardless of whether you find yourself in the unfortunate circumstance of homelessness or you have been fortunate enough to be supported in public housing; whether you rent a home, whether you own a home, whether you rent a home to somebody else, whether you are a builder, a certifier or an investor. Our housing strategy seeks to engage with people across that breadth of the community”

THE THREE STRIKES EVICTION POLICY
AND THE HUMAN RIGHTS OF PUBLIC TENANTS.

Mick de Brenni -“The previous government's Three Strikes Policy was a gimmick that was aimed at throwing some of the most vulnerable Queenslanders out of their homes”

I have said before that I am proud to be the housing minister and to ensure that people who live in our homes, many of whom have challenging needs around disability, many of whom have mental health challenges, are supported to stay in their home that we have provided them. Simply disregarding their needs and pushing them into homelessness not only is inappropriate but also shows a lack of sophistication and a lack of compassion for people in Queensland."

Very well said.

It would be interesting to find out what happened to vacated public housing properties following evictions ... Did they remain state housing in public hands? Were they given away to Community Housing businesses? Or were they sold off privately ..?? 

“As I said on almost my first day as minister,the introduction of these policies when I announced them, was about no longer treating public housing tenants as second-class citizens”

Mick deBrenni - “I want to outline for the benefit of the committee the basis on which housing policy decisions are now made. They are to ensure natural justice for the tenant to have right of reply, to ensure we do not discriminate against vulnerable people, to ensure that we are reasonable according to legal and legislative definitions, and to ensure we have a human element.”

And“fairness means fairness for everybody”

On DOMESTIC VIOLENCE

Mick de Brenni- “When I had coffee with a domestic violence victim, Benita, in my own neighbourhood and I understood how powerful it was for her to know that she would no longer be trapped in a violent household, I knew it was the right thing for our government to do to make it easier for survivors of domestic and family violence to have their names removed from tenancy black lists where those listings were due to the violent behaviour of their partner”
Another excellent move by the Palaszczuk government.

In his summing up,he says,
“This goes back to the comments I made before about the privatisation of public housing. I am very proud to be the Minister for Housing in Queensland. The delivery of an essential service that is as personal as one's home is something that a Labor government feels very strongly about.” 

Unfortunately not all Labor governments in all states- nor Labor politicians federally...

Throughout the Estimates Hearing transcript, Minister de Brenni talks about the comprehensive consultation undertaken by his government. It is obvious that he consults widely and actually listens to the people who are most impacted by the housing crisis.

Subsequently people are keen to talk to him, since housing is an issue that affects us all.

Meanwhile in Victoria the ALP Housing Minister, Martin Foley, is being bitterly accused of just the opposite - not engaging with, and listening to the people who are being hit the hardest by the housing crisis,and those who have the most to lose - homeless people and public tenants.










Monday, 15 August 2016

5,000 HOMES SAVED FROM PRIVATISATION !


HUGE WIN FOR PUBLIC HOUSING IN QUEENSLAND !!

"It’s not the policy of this government to privatise essential services and I want to make it very clear that this includes public housing."

MICK DE BRENNI - ALP MINISTER FOR HOUSING QUEENSLAND.




There are frustrating reasons why it is so difficult, getting the issue of the national ongoing privatisation of Public Housing into public awareness.

One reason is the absence of voices raised 'loud and clear' and publicly by Liberal, Labor and Greens politicians unequivocally opposing this course of action.

It's the 'cone of silence' surrounding the very subject of the public housing stock transfers.

Stock transfers are the underpinning of the growth and expansion of the Community Housing sector !! This is what the public is not being told, amidst the 'affordable housing' rhetoric.

Recently 'The Conversation' featured an article by Community Housing exponent, Hal Pawson who made it clear what the arguments are, from the perspective of Community Housing. We have countered these arguments in previous posts - including the inaccurate stereotyping of public tenants and public housing that he speaks of.

Due to a lack of adequate media coverage and scrutiny, especially considering the importance of this subject, it is quite likely that you have missed a very important piece of news - which has given heart to public tenants and members of the general public alike.

The Queensland Labor Minister for Housing, Mick de Brenni, in an Estimates Committee Hearing on 20.7.2016 announced a halt to the privatisation of nearly 5000 homes! An ambitious plan to privatise Logan, an area with a great deal of public housing just south of Brisbane, has now been scrapped.

We applaud Mick de Brenni and the Queensland Palaszczuk government in saving public housing from privatisation. This is what people expect from a Labor government !!

But, according to the article by Hal Pawson, the Queensland ALP State government's position is 'inconsistent with Labor policy elsewhere' and 'out of line with that of other Labor colleagues federally and in some other key states.' 

He gives the example of Labor leader, Luke Foley in NSW, who was quite prepared to hand over the titles of 20,000 publicly owned properties in 2015 !!

In the wake of the recent federal election results, all Labor governments should come to their senses on this issue of extraordinary national importance. Labor should not be taking us in a direction that is sure to be very unpopular with the Australian people when they learn of it!

Mick de Brenni and the Qld State Government is showing real leadership here - reminding people exactly what a Labor party should be standing for.

In his own words, here are Mick de Brenni's reasons regarding his decision. 
Excerpts from the Estimates Committee Hearing.

Mick de Brenni

'The previous government's pathway had no light. In fact, it was only highlighted by a risky scheme to hand over control of 90 per cent of the $15 billion housing portfolio to the private sector -a mass privatisation of public housing. I want to be clear for the committee that the mass transfer of housing is not the policy of this government. That is why today, in line with the government policy, the director-general of my department informed Logan City Community Housing that we will not be continuing with the Logan Renewal Initiative. A housing scheme of that scale with that level of risk is unprecedented in this nation. The Logan Renewal Initiative was a risky LNP scheme and it was outright unnecessary.'
 
Addressing what is, after all, a governmental responsibility- "Today, I sent a very clear message to the people of Queensland that we are committed to delivering front-line housing services for the most vulnerable people in this community". "As someone who represents Logan and lives in that community and someone who will bring my kids up in that community, I will not accept putting the needs of that community in the too-hard basket and palming the responsibility off to someone else"

"I have decided to terminate the contract for the privatisation of almost 5,000 homes that people in the region of Logan live in. This would have resulted in government no longer being responsible for the delivery of an essential service in this state. I believe that government, and I believe that the people of Queensland, and I believe that the people of Logan made a clear decision around the privatisation of publicly owned assets in January 2015 which included our responsibility to deliver public housing to vulnerable Queenslanders."

He goes on to say that public housing- its management and ownership "will remain in the hands of the people of Queensland."  Yes !!

'The government has taken a very clear decision today to ensure that privatisation or selling off of public houses is no longer going to occur under this government'.

And more genuine public housing is going to be built as well.

In addressing the ambiguous term 'affordable housing' the Qld Housing Minister goes on to say,
'One of the unfortunate realities today in Queensland is that far too many people are unable to find housing that ought to be properly described as affordable for them. I think affordability needs to be considered not just in terms of the housing market but also in terms of the incomes of people in our communities.' 

The term 'affordable housing' is not being used by Community Housing Organisations in layman's terms - but has been defined as up to 80% of market rents- often 75% to ensure eligibility for charitable status and tax exemptions. Community Housing also relies on ongoing Commonwealth Rent Assistance - CRA- which goes to the new landlord. This is another reason why Labor in Queensland is showing responsible governance in rejecting this massive proposal to privatise Logan as being far too risky. The precariousness of handing over public housing to Community Housing businesses should be more widely understood.

People need to be enlightened about the differences between public, social and community housing. Politics is a tricky business and the language which has been adopted throughout obfuscates rather than clarifies.

At the Estimates Hearing, Mick de Brenni speaks of people in communities who are already struggling to survive- and says that this is why it is 'so important' that we ensure that the Queensland government's public housing stock 'remains in public hands - that it is not privatised, sold or given away'.

The Palaszczuk ALP government has also introduced legislation to remove the controversial Three Strikes Eviction Policy- a policy that all too often results in homelessness. This is another massive win for vulnerable people. Friends of Public Housing Vic have been informed by Barrister and Human Rights expert Moira Rayner that the policy was 'probably unlawful' under the Human Rights Charter since 'mandatory rules are inherently arbitrary.' The decision to remove this policy has been undertaken by Minister de Brenni to "ensure we do not discriminate against vulnerable people". In other states, including Victoria, the Three Strikes Eviction Policy continues to operate.

It is amazing that so little of this historic decision by the Queensland government, to overturn previous policy directions for public housing, has been reported or widely discussed in the media.

I guess it is just as well that we have social media to bring things to light and to bring a different perspective and a different narrative to what is generally known.

So crack open the bubbly - in the ongoing campaign to save public housing in Australia from privatisation, we have had a victory in Queensland!


https://www.parliament.qld.gov.au/…/2016_07_20_EstimatesIPC
p87 onwards 
http://statements.qld.gov.au/Statement/2016/7/20/new-thinking-for-logan-housing
http://theconversation.com/ditching-logans-public-private-regeneration-sets-queensland-back-on-social-and-affordable-housing-62941
  
 

Friday, 1 July 2016

THE POSITIVE POWER OF COMMUNITY


What lovely girls!

I feel so blessed to be a part of their daily lives.

I supported and encouraged their mother during the little one's birth
and welcomed the baby into the world.

                            *****

This is one of the best things about living in Public Housing-
being a member of a close-knit community.

Their lovely mother has this to say,

'Public Housing means everything to us!  Coming to this country as a refugee, public housing gave me security and a safe home. There's a big difference between public housing and private housing. I lived in private rental place till I was offered my public housing flat. I did not like living in private rental. I felt like a different person there. Everyone just lives their own life. No-one cares about you.
I felt lonely. Public housing gave me confidence because everybody here is friendly. Public tenants come from a lot of different cultural backgrounds.'

In the Ethiopian culture everyone supports and cares for one another. There is no question of suffering alone through hard times. The community will rally around.
She goes on to say  "I think this is why there is so much suicide in this country. People are too much alone."

People need to feel that they belong.

Australia is changing- and in some fundamental ways-  for the worse.
Our communities are at risk of being broken up and gentrified.
Vulnerable people are being left behind and poverty and homelessness are increasing.

In practice the doctrine of neoliberalism is swift and aggressive as it seeks to restructure society to the benefit of the elite. And money is its core defining value. It is stunning really how quickly these paradigm changes are taking place. If you are lucky it has not personally affected you yet.

When it comes to 'social capital' Public Housing communities are rich indeed.
Our communities are not without  challenges- sure, but that's par for the course everywhere.

If I could describe living in Public Housing in two words  I'd say cheerful and neighbourly.
Social inclusion, tolerance and looking out for one another are sound values that are part and parcel of our communities.

The covert way that public housing is disappearing and being privatised without common knowledge of it - well, I would not have thought it possible in Australia even four years ago.

And certainly not in the Australia I grew up in...








Wednesday, 29 June 2016

PIBCI - SAFEGUARD PUBLIC ASSETS







Statement of Support from PIBCI
Public Interest Before Corporate Interests







PIBCI is more than willing to support Friends of Public Housing Victoria
to oppose any further stock transfers of public housing properties to social community housing.

We also advocate that public housing should remain in public hands, both ownership and management.

As a movement PIBCI is committed to the safe-guarding of public assets and the further
improvement of such assets.

The take-over by private interest groups in our opinion will be increasing deregulation,
and ultimately it will become profit driven for stakeholders.

This is not in the public interest.


                                            **********************


The convenor of PIBCI, Dr Joe Toscano is running as an  Independent Candidate in the
House of Representatives for Dunkley.

MAKE THE 1% PAY 1%

From his Facebook page

"At this Federal Election you, as a Dunkley elector, have a real choice. You can vote for the same old parties making promises you know they will never keep or you can vote for Independent Candidate Dr. Joseph Toscano. Made from the same mould as the early 20th century radical activist Louisa Dunkley, after whom the electorate of Dunkley is named after, Dr. Joseph Toscano has the experience, intellect, courage and tenacity to ensure making the 1% pay 1% becomes a central plank of Australian politics during the next three years if he is elected as the Member for Dunkley.

Over 150 billion dollars per year can be freed up for public health, public education, public housing, public infrastructure, public renewable energy facilities and the funding of a social security system that looks after the needs of all Australians, not just those with the disposable income to buy the best health, housing and education services money can buy."


https://www.facebook.com/Toscano4Dunkley/info/?tab=page_info