PUBLIC HOUSING LOSES OUT IN VIC GOVT'S 'BIG HOUSING BUILD'

DEAR SUPPORTERS OF PUBLIC TENANTS AND PUBLIC HOUSING
PLEASE READ OUR PRESS RELEASE.

PRESS RELEASE
For Immediate Release 26.11.20

Friends of Public Housing Victoria welcomes the government's commitment of over 5 billion dollars to increasing Victoria's housing stock. However we are alarmed that, in spite of this being falsely advertised as a Public Housing build, it continues the disastrous government policy of replacing Public Housing with private 'Community Housing'.

The fact that this is being achieved by keeping public tenants in the dark, as well as the public more broadly, is a national disgrace.

The removal of Councils' input in this process and the speed with which it is being fast-tracked through the stages of Parliament make one suspect that the government is once again attempting to privatise public land and Public Housing without the openness and transparency that ought to be taking place.

Although there have been many behind-the-scenes machinations undertaken to get us to this point, there has never been a public discussion about such a major paradigm change.

We firmly believe that if the public were aware of the reality of the privatisation of Public Housing they would oppose it. The government and media continue to blur the issue by using the term 'Social Housing' to conflate the two housing models.

We urge all politicians to to speak out publicly on this matter and /or lobby energetically within their party.

END

Friends of Public Housing Victoria
housing.humanrights@gmail.com

Further information
Friends of Public Housing Victoria
https://www.facebook.com/FOPHVIC
http://savepublichousing.blogspot.com.au/

MASSIVE PUBLIC LAND-GRAB PLANNED - SEEKING COUNCIL SUPPORT.

Dear Followers of this Blog.

Thirteen councils in the East and South-East of Melbourne (representing over 2 million people) have signed a Charter advocating that a massive amount of public land be made available for Public Private Partnerships, which will have a component of 'Social' or 'Affordable Housing'. The rationale is that this will address homelessness.

Here is Friends of Public Housing Victoria's position statement regarding this housing strategy,which was sent to councillors and candidates before the Council elections.

Our position statement was the result of numerous drafts formulated within FOPHV( public tenants, activists and supporters),as well as members of Defend and Extend Public Housing and Hands Off Public Housing. We thank everyone for their collaborative efforts.

Of course the arguments and principles contained in our position statement apply not only to the thirteen councils but are widely relevant.

Thankyou for all the responses we received from councillors and candidates who were unaware of aspects of the Charter, and thanked us for explaining some of the nuances of the arguments. It was a successful political action on our part.

--------------------------------------------------

Re ‘The Regional Local Government Homelessness and Social Housing Charter 2020’

Friends of Public Housing Victoria (FOPHV) write to support and welcome 13 Councils' intention to tackle homelessness and housing stress, but have grave reservations about the current plans to sacrifice public land to support an endeavour which is unlikely to meet its objectives.

In particular, we urge the Councils to concentrate their support on Public Housing rather than on promoting so-called “Social Housing ” (read Community Housing) in Public Private Partnerships. Please note- the major Community Housing Associations are also property developers.

As you may be aware, the term Social Housing is being used as an umbrella term and misleadingly conflates two very different housing models - basically public and private.It is Public Housing which is the best solution to ending homelessness. The other options are expensive ways of not meeting that objective.

In our view, the issue of homelessness is being used here as an emotional hook to ensure the public’s blind support for this dubious change in housing policy direction.

In fact Community Housing does not have a good record in housing the homeless or in sustaining tenancies. It prefers working tenants and often shamelessly overlooks the homeless and is quick to evict, relative to Public Housing. This is a consequence of the Community Housing model itself, which requires it to make a surplus.

As we have already seen with the Public Housing Renewal Program ( PHRP ), which also involves Public Private Partnerships and the loss of public land, only a small proportion of the land ends up being used even for Community Housing and none for Public Housing. Private interests appropriate the rest.

Lack of transparency

The language used to discuss these issues lacks transparency.

‘Social Housing’ in practice nearly always means Community Housing, although its definition extends in theory to Public Housing. ‘Community’ and ‘Social’ housing are warm fuzzy terms that disguise the cold hard reality of privatisation. Community Housing is a misleading term referring to corporate structures less answerable to tenants or to the general public than Public Housing. Commercial-in-confidence protects Community Housing from scrutiny. The public is unable to find out how public funds and assets are utilised. Even the term Public Housing is now being misused. eg Community Housing is being called by the Victorian Government the 'new Public Housing'. ‘Affordable Housing’ is another slippery term. Properties charging up to 80% of market rents (usually set at 75% to ensure charitable status and tax breaks) can call themselves ‘Affordable Housing’. This is hardly affordable for many people on low incomes.

In particular the term ‘Social Housing’ conceals the practice of ‘stock transfers’ - the gifting of Public Housing property titles, and the transfer of management which is often a precursor to title transfer. This bipartisan policy of privatisation has been going on for the last 10 years with little to no public discussion.

More background

The Victorian Labor Government is on record as planning to transfer the management of more Public Housing stock to Community Housing, with a view to title transfer at a later date. Labor has refused to divulge how many properties it intends to hand over. In 2017 Victorian State budget submission, the Community/ Social Housing Industry called for the titles of an additional 12,000 publicly owned properties to be given to them.

Unlike Public Housing, Community Housing requires a constant stream of Commonwealth Rent Assistance ( CRA ) in order for it to function. This makes Community Housing and their tenants vulnerable to changes in Federal policy. Rather than propping up Community Housing with CRA, this public money would be better spent in building public housing.

Should a tenant experience an adverse change in circumstances ( sickness, unemployment etc ) Community Housing businesses are bound only by a vague ‘hardship provision’ clause, unlike the Public Housing system which adjusts rents to 25% of the reduced income. It is this protection that literally keeps people off the streets!

According to ‘The Regional Local Government Homelessness and Social Housing Charter 2020’ the 13 Councils that are signatories are not bound to any specific actions. Friends of Public Housing Victoria therefore asks, in regard to such an important issue as homelessness, that Councillors will serve their communities rather than the policies of any particular party and will look at this issue with an independent eye.

In reality, it is unlikely that this ‘Regional Local Government Homelessness and Social Housing Charter 2020’ direction will have any significant impact on homelessness.

To make matters worse, irreplaceable public land will be gifted to private developers including Housing Associations, and the opportunity to solve the problem of homelessness by building public housing on public land will be lost.

WHERE THE CHARTER AND ITS BACKGROUND BRIEFING GET IT WRONG.

The Charter which has been signed by 13 Councils contains some serious errors and omissions.

In its definition it claims that ‘Social Housing is rented to ‘low income households’. In fact, middle income renters are also eligible for 'Social Housing' as defined in the Government Gazette. A single person without dependents can earn up to $62,600 per annum and still be eligible for ‘Social’ and ‘Affordable’ Housing.

Community Housing leases might begin at 30% of income, but there are no guarantees that this won’t change, especially as Community Housing Organisations are separate businesses with their own policies and procedures, and there are a great deal of variations across the board.

In the background briefing, the point is made that "experts agree that Social Housing is the best solution to preventing homelessness". In fact homelessness expert Professor Guy Johnson and AHURI have both conceded that Public Housing is superior to all other models,including Community Housing, in combating homelessness.

Friends of Public Housing Victoria would like to offer a platform to Councillors wishing to support Public Housing.

We are compiling a Report Card before the Council Elections and publishing the results widely on our social media platforms. Please answer the following questions for the benefit of your constituents.

REPORT CARD

Flag - please read carefully.

In the interest of clarity there has been a slight change in wording from the previous version of our Report Card.

1. Do you support Public Housing as an integral part of the housing mix?
2. In Victoria, Public Housing as distinct from Community Housing, makes up 2.7% of all housing. Is this too high? Is this too low?
3. Is Public Housing the best model for preventing and addressing homelessness?
4. Have you or anyone in your family or friendship circle ever been homeless?
5. Do you think the language regarding the various housing models should be more transparent?
6. Do you think the issue of Public Housing versus Community Housing has been sufficiently discussed in the public domain?
7. Should public tenants and those eligible for public housing be sufficiently informed of the differences between Community and Public Housing and of their rights and protections?
8. Do you oppose the transferring of Public Housing stock to Community Housing corporations?
9. Do you support a significant build of Public Housing in your area to address homelessness?
10. Would public land that is being earmarked for private and 'Social Housing’ be better utilised for Public Housing?

Any further comments you wish to make are welcome,and will be published.
Please respond via our campaign email address housinghumanrights@gmail.com

FRIENDS OF PUBLIC HOUSING VICTORIA
DEFEND AND EXTEND PUBLIC HOUSING and HANDS OFF PUBLIC HOUSING

https://www.facebook.com/FOPHVIC http://savepublichousing.blogspot.com.au/

SOURCES

http://baysidenews.com.au/2020/09/14/councils-unite-for-social-housing/
The Regional Local Government Homelessness & Social Housing Charter 2020 (pdf, 1MB)
https://www.frankston.vic.gov.au/Your_Council/Advocacy/Tackling_homelessness_in_Frankston_City/Regional_Local_Government_Homelessness_and_Social_Housing_Group_Charter

CATHERINE NOONE -INDEPENDENT CANDIDATE FOR YARRA

CATHERINE NOONE -INDEPENDENT CANDIDATE FOR YARRA- 

RESPONDS TO OUR REPORT CARD

 

1. Do you support Public Housing as an integral part of the housing mix?
 

A.  Absolutely.

2. In Victoria, Public Housing as distinct from Community Housing, makes up 2.7% of all housing. Is this too high? Is this too low?
 

A. Too low

3. Is Public Housing the best model for preventing and addressing homelessness?
 

A. Yes, alongside other supports and systemic change.

4. Have you or anyone in your family or friendship circle ever been homeless?
 

A. Yes.

5. Do you think the language regarding the various housing models should be more transparent?
 

A. Yes.

6. Do you think the issue of Public Housing versus Community Housing has been sufficiently discussed in the public domain?
 

A. No. As with the previous question, language can be used as a tool to shape discussions to suit different purposes. Clearer communication about housing issues is needed.

7. Should public tenants and those eligible for public housing be sufficiently informed of the differences between Community and Public Housing and of their rights and protections?
 

A.Yes.

8. Do you oppose the transferring of Public Housing stock to Community Housing corporations?
A. Yes.

9. Do you support a significant build of Public Housing in your area to address homelessness?
 

A.Yes.

10. Would public land that is being earmarked for private and 'Social Housing’ be better utilised for Public Housing?
 

A. Yes
 

Further comments welcome and will be published

   Thank you for raising these issues and continuing to advocate for public housing. The voices of people in public housing must be heard and considered in decision making. While many of the issues highlighted by the current pandemic are not new for a lot of people, housing and social issues are going to need extra support, advocacy and planning. Council will have to work with the community and other levels of government to ensure better ongoing outcomes for people in Yarra, regardless of their type of housing.

Thanks from

FRIENDS OF PUBLIC HOUSING VIC

DEFEND AND EXTEND PUBLIC HOUSING

HANDS OFF PUBLIC HOUSING
 

GABRIELLE DE VIETRI - GREENS CANDIDATE FOR YARRA

GABRIELLE DE VIETRI - GREENS CANDIDATE FOR YARRA - 

RESPONDS TO OUR REPORT CARD

1. Do you support Public Housing as an integral part of the housing mix? 

A. Public housing is an essential part of the housing mix, and should be supported, improved and increased. In planning for the needs of our growing community, I will advocate for better and more public housing. I will advocate for increasing public housing in Yarra as well as maintaining and upgrading existing public housing and associated facilities. Every person should have enough space to live in, access to amenities that are in good, functioning order, and culturally and linguistically appropriate services available to them. In response to calls from public housing residents in Yarra, I will also advocate for the establishment of a charter of rights for public housing tenants, including the establishment of a dedicated Public Housing Ombudsman to handle issues, concerns and complaints from public housing residents. I will encourage and promote tenant participation in decisions about public housing services. I believe that in order to adequately service public housing communities, the function of Public Housing should be removed from the Department of Health and Human Services and into a new statutory Public Housing Authority. In advocating for new and existing public housing communities, I will promote the importance of significant open space and I will support the adaptation of public housing to mitigate the effects of climate change, such as heat stress.


2. In Victoria, Public Housing as distinct from Community Housing, makes up 2.7% of all housing. Is this too high? Is this too low?

A. 2.7% is much too low. I will strongly support opportunities to increase the amount of public housing in Yarra.


3. Is Public Housing the best model for preventing and addressing homelessness?

A. Yes. Other proposed private models lack transparency and are unaffordable for those who need it most.


4. Have you or anyone in your family or friendship circle ever been homeless?

A.Yes, I have supported friends through periods of homelessness and understand some of the complexities that accompany homelessness.


5. Do you think the language regarding the various housing models should be more transparent? 

A. See 7.

6. Do you think the issue of Public Housing versus Community Housing has been sufficiently discussed in the public domain?

A. No, there is little public awareness or understanding of the vast differences between the terms.

7. Should public tenants and those eligible for public housing be sufficiently informed of the differences between Community and Public Housing and of their rights and protections?

A. Yes, these differences must be clear and delivered in appropriate and diverse languages. Prospective tenants must be supported to understand the conditions of the tenancy and whether it is appropriate for their situation.

8. Do you oppose the transferring of Public Housing stock to Community Housing corporations?

A. Yes. I will oppose the sell-off of public housing sites in Yarra, and oppose the conversion of public housing to "social", "community" or "affordable" housing. I will oppose the privatisation of public housing by the State Government. I believe there is also the need for affordable housing stock, but it should not replace the provision of public housing.

 
9. Do you support a significant build of Public Housing in your area to address homelessness?
 

A. Yes. I will support opportunities to build more public housing in Yarra.

10. Would public land that is being earmarked for private and 'Social Housing’ be better utilised for Public Housing?
 

A. Yes, there is a dire need for more Public Housing to meet the needs of low-income earners and people facing homelessess.

 
Any further comments you wish to make are welcome, and will be published.

I am proud to be running for Council on a joint Greens ticket with Anab Mohamud, who is a public housing resident and a true leader of the community.The Yarra Green's public housing policies are can be found in our "Care for People" and "Built Environment" policies, here: https://greens.org.au/vic/lga/yarra

Thanks from

FRIENDS OF PUBLIC HOUSING VIC

DEFEND AND EXTEND PUBLIC HOUSING

HANDS OFF PUBLIC HOUSING

CARMEN LAHIFF-JENKINS, REASON PARTY CANDIDATE FOR DAREBIN

CARMEN LAHIFF-JENKINS - REASON PARTY CANDIDATE FOR DAREBIN - RESPONDS TO OUR REPORT CARD

1. Do you support Public Housing as an integral part of the housing mix?

A.Absolutely!


2. In Victoria, Public Housing as distinct from Community Housing, makes up 2.7% of all housing.
  Is this too high? Is this too low?

A.Too low!


3. Is Public Housing the best model for preventing and addressing homelessness?

A. YES!


4. Have you or anyone in your family or friendship circle ever been homeless?

A.Yes.


5. Do you think the language regarding the various housing models should be more transparent? 

A.Yes, I really do!


6. Do you think the issue of Public Housing versus Community Housing has been sufficiently discussed in the public domain? 

A. Absolutely not, people always confuse the two. People utilising public housing should be well informed and consulted. They are not. It’s disempowering and does not service this community appropriately.


7. Should public tenants and those eligible for public housing be sufficiently informed of the differences between Community and Public Housing and of their rights and protections? 

A. Of course! Again, people utilising public housing should be empowered within this service to influence it.

8. Do you oppose the transferring of Public Housing stock to Community Housing corporations?

A. Yes, Public housing stock needs replenishing.

 
9. Do you support a significant build of Public Housing in your area to address homelessness? 

A. Yes, absolutely.

10. Would public land that is being earmarked for private and 'Social Housing’ be better utilised for Public Housing?

A. Yes, public housing stock has been undermined and diminished while need has risen. Community housing is also important but they are not the same thing, for the same groups.

Thanks from

FRIENDS OF PUBLIC HOUSING VIC

DEFEND AND EXTEND PUBLIC HOUSING

HANDS OFF PUBLIC HOUSING

JESSICA SULLIVAN - INDEPENDENT CANDIDATE- DAREBIN

JESSICA SULLIVAN- INDEPENDENT CANDIDATE FOR DAREBIN -RESPONDS TO OUR REPORT CARD
 

1. Do you support Public Housing as an integral part of the housing mix?

A. Yes, Public Housing plays a vital part in supporting our community and it is too often overlooked when Council/State planning and development officials are designing our future infrastructure and amenities.

2. In Victoria, Public Housing as distinct from Community Housing, makes up 2.7% of all housing. Is this too high? Is this too low?

A.Far too low, the wait lists for Public Housing were so long that it was unsustainable before the pandemic. Post-pandemic the demand is only going to increase further.

3. Is Public Housing the best model for preventing and addressing homelessness?
 

A. Yes, in conjunction with increasing the rate of social support payments and making sure that other social service programs are sufficiently funded and easily accessible.

4. Have you or anyone in your family or friendship circle ever been homeless? 

A. Yes, I'm grateful that they did not have to sleep rough but I know several people who have been without stable housing and had to sleep in their cars, "couch surf" amongst friends and stay at shelters. Sleeping rough is the most confronting form of homelessness and naturally requires the most support, but governments choose to overlook the statistics of other forms of homelessness to downplay how prevalent homelessness is in Australia.

5. Do you think the language regarding the various housing models should be more transparent?

A.Yes, people need to understand that there is a big difference between public housing (state run), community housing (NFP run) and 'affordable housing' (arbitrary concept). All levels of Government blur the line between these housing models when it is convenient to them.

6. Do you think the issue of Public Housing versus Community Housing has been sufficiently discussed in the public domain?
 

A. No. The State Governments advertise Community Housing as being similar to Public Housing with rents capped at 25-30% of income, except that CH is run by not-for-profits while PH is run by the States. However many people would be shocked to learn that CH providers often charge tenants additional fees on top of rent which can greatly increase the percentage of the tenants' income that goes to housing and push them into rental stress.

7. Should public tenants and those eligible for public housing be sufficiently informed of the differences between Community and Public Housing and of their rights and protections?

A. Absolutely, it is shocking that this is not already standard procedure.

8. Do you oppose the transferring of Public Housing stock to Community Housing corporations?
 

A. Yes, this is a bell that cannot be unrung. First and foremost, we must remember that PH isn't just a bunch of building 'Assets' on the State's Balance Sheet, but peoples' homes where they have formed a connection to the local community.  When the Public Housing is sold off to Community Housing operators, the costs to tenants can go up and the rules regarding their tenancy can change without their consent, this puts these people at a risk of being evicted and displaced. Community Housing does have a place in the housing mix, but it should be in addition to Public Housing never as a replacement.

9. Do you support a significant build of Public Housing in your area to address homelessness?
 

A. Yes, and I will strongly oppose any further sell-off off PH within Darebin as it will negatively affect the wellbeing of our residents.

10. Would public land that is being earmarked for private and 'Social Housing’ be better utilised for Public Housing?
 

A.Yes. 

Further comments welcome and will be published.

 "Hi FOPHV team,
Thank you for your email and the opportunity to answer your questions. I appreciate all the advocacy work that FOPHV has done to support people in public housing, to educate everyone about different housing models and to keep everyone informed about the State Government's sale of Public Housing."

Thanks from

FRIENDS OF PUBLIC HOUSING VIC

DEFEND AND EXTEND PUBLIC HOUSING

HANDS OFF PUBLIC HOUSING

MINWEN WU - INDEPENDENT CANDIDATE - WHITEHORSE

"VOTE FOR WHO? MR WU!"  says Mr Wu 

who has assured his electorate that he is not a Chinese spy!

 Mr Wu did not respond to our Report Card, but wrote to us with this message. 

Hi FOPHV,

My apology for not being able for now to delve into the world of social housing, public housing and community housing etc. 

All I can say for now is: 

1. I promise I will research extensively and consult you on this issue in detail if elected. 

2. I've met & made friends with some homeless people in Box Hill central. 

3. Housing is basic human rights to each and every Australian. 

Who cares? WU cares!

Best Regards

Minwen Wu
    
Thanks from
FRIENDS OF PUBLIC HOUSING VIC
DEFEND AND EXTEND PUBLIC HOUSING
HANDS OFF PUBLIC HOUSING.

AMANDA STONE - GREENS COUNCILLOR YARRA

AMANDA STONE - GREENS COUNCILLOR -YARRA- RESPONDS TO OUR REPORT CARD 

1. Do you support Public Housing as an integral part of the housing mix?

A.  Yes, it should be major component.

2. In Victoria, Public Housing as distinct from Community Housing, makes up 2.7% of all housing. Is this too high? Is this too low?
 

A. Far too low. I have been advocating for an increase to the overall public housing stock in Victoria for many years

3. Is Public Housing the best model for preventing and addressing homelessness?

A. Yes. It provides low cost, means tested, secure and supported housing for those who need it most.

 
4. Have you or anyone in your family or friendship circle ever been homeless? 

A. Yes, a family member and friends have all experienced periods of homelessness for a range of different reasons.
 

5. Do you think the language regarding the various housing models should be more transparent? 

A. Yes. Residents in particular do not always understand the implications of the different language used to describe different forms of housing and they experience a shock when moving from public to community housing for example.

6. Do you think the issue of Public Housing versus Community Housing has been sufficiently discussed in the public domain? 

A. I think the difference between the two is poorly understood and that the blurring of language over time has contributed to that. There are characteristics of public housing which are fundamental to large numbers of residents, especially the security and social support, and the importance of this is not well understood.

 
7. Should public tenants and those eligible for public housing be sufficiently informed of the differences between Community and Public Housing and of their rights and protections? 

A.Yes they should.  When the need for housing is urgent, people may accept a place which does not best suit their needs. It can be very difficult to move again if a place is not successful.

8. Do you oppose the transferring of Public Housing stock to Community Housing corporations?

A. Yes. There is a place for both forms of housing. Public housing should be retained in public hands and expanded. Community Housing is also needed in addition to, not instead of,  more public housing.

 
9. Do you support a significant build of Public Housing in your area to address homelessness?

A.Yes. There is vacant public housing land in Richmond which has not been built on despite being available for over 10 years. Part of a Green New Deal COVID Recovery could include new public housing construction at this site.

10. Would public land that is being earmarked for private and 'Social Housing’ be better utilised for Public Housing?

A. Yes

 

Thanks from
FRIENDS OF PUBLIC HOUSING VIC
DEFEND AND EXTEND PUBLIC HOUSING
HANDS OFF PUBLIC HOUSING.
 

SANTI WHITESIDE - INDEPENDENT CANDIDATE- WHITEHORSE

 SANTI WHITESIDE RESPONDS TO OUR REPORT CARD

 

1. Do you support Public Housing as an integral part of the housing mix? 

A. Yes

2. In Victoria, Public Housing as distinct from Community Housing, makes up 2.7% of all housing.
    Is this too high? Is this too low? 

A.Too low

3. Is Public Housing the best model for preventing and addressing homelessness? 

A. Yes but in conjunction with other initiatives

4. Have you or anyone in your family or friendship circle ever been homeless? 

A. No
 

5. Do you think the language regarding the various housing models should be more transparent? 

A. Yes
 

6. Do you think the issue of Public Housing versus Community Housing has been sufficiently discussed in the public domain? 

A. No
 

7. Should public tenants and those eligible for public housing be sufficiently informed of the differences between Community and Public Housing and of their rights and protections? 

A. Yes
 

8. Do you oppose the transferring of Public Housing stock to Community Housing corporations? 

A. Yes

9. Do you support a significant build of Public Housing in your area to address homelessness? 

A. Yes but more analysis and information needed to decide the most effective locations.

10. Would public land that is being earmarked for private and 'Social Housing’ be better utilised for Public Housing? 

A. Yes

Additional comments welcome and will be published.

"Thank you for your email concerning this very important issue."

Thanks from

Friends of Public Housing Vic

Defend and Extend Public Housing

Hands Off Public Housing

DENNIS FITZGERALD- INDEPENDENT CANDIDATE- WHITEHORSE

 DENNIS FITZGERALD RESPONDS TO OUR REPORT CARD

"Thank-you for your email. I  have read your material and my responses are below. Although I have not faced homelessness personally I have several friends who now as seniors are facing a degree of homelessness and are relying on friends for accommodation."

Regards

Dennis Fitzgerald

1. Do you support Public Housing as an integral part of the housing mix?

A. Yes, there is a need and a right for people to have safe accommodation and that may need to be provided as part of public housing.

2. In Victoria, Public Housing as distinct from Community Housing, makes up 2.7% of all housing.
Is this too high? Is this too low?

A. It is too high in that people should have their own housing although the reality is that this isn't always possible. It is too low in that there is a greater need.

3. Is Public Housing the best model for preventing and addressing homelessness?

A. It is part of the answer but just one part. There is often a need for further supports, food, education, medical and mental care.

4. Have you or anyone in your family or friendship circle ever been homeless?

A. Yes, but not long term actual 'sleeping on the street' homeless. It was similar to university days when they have had to couch surf.

5. Do you think the language regarding the various housing models should be more transparent?

A. Yes, and available in multiple languages and with support to process what can be very complex.

6. Do you think the issue of Public Housing versus Community Housing has been sufficiently discussed in the public domain?

A. No, as it is difficult to resolve so politicians avoid it. It is also uncomfortable for many people so that want to either ignore or deny it.

7. Should public tenants and those eligible for public housing be sufficiently informed of the differences between Community and Public Housing and of their rights and protections?

A. Yes

8. Do you oppose the transferring of Public Housing stock to Community Housing corporations?

I think public housing is a better solution but need to look at this in more detail.

9. Do you support a significant build of Public Housing in your area to address homelessness?

A. Yes

10. Would public land that is being earmarked for private and 'Social Housing’ be better utilised for Public Housing?

A. Yes.

Thanks from 

Friends of Public Housing Vic

Defend and Extend Public Housing 

Hands Off Public Housing

ANNA PORRITT - INDEPENDENT CANIDATE - KNOX

Anna Porritt did not respond to our Report Card, but wrote us the following paragraph.

Dear FOPHV,

I have witnessed a man sleeping in a park for at least 2 years. 

And trying to get him some long term shelter was difficult to do.


Again recently I witnessed a man seeking some money from people. 

He needed it to get some place to stay. Though I know he lived under a bridge.

I think it is absolutely concerning to know people regardless of their circumstances need proper housing.

I am an Independent Candidate and local resident of Rowville.

If successfully elected homeless is an issue I would like addressed .

Kind regards
Anna Porritt

ANNE MAKHIJANI - INDEPENDENT CANDIDATE - WHITEHORSE

ANNE MAKHIJANI RESPONDS TO OUR REPORT CARD.


1. Do you support Public Housing as an integral part of the housing mix? 

 A. YES

 
2. In Victoria, Public Housing as distinct from Community Housing, makes up 2.7% of all housing.
  Is this too high? Is this too low? 

A. LOW

 
3. Is Public Housing the best model for preventing and addressing homelessness? 

A. YES

 
4. Have you or anyone in your family or friendship circle ever been homeless? 

A. NO

 
5. Do you think the language regarding the various housing models should be more transparent? 

 A. ABSOLUTELY

6. Do you think the issue of Public Housing versus Community Housing has been sufficiently discussed in the public domain? 

A. NO

7. Should public tenants and those eligible for public housing be sufficiently informed of the differences between Community and Public Housing and of their rights and protections? 

A. YES

8. Do you oppose the transferring of Public Housing stock to Community Housing corporations? 

A. YES

 
9. Do you support a significant build of Public Housing in your area to address homelessness?

A. YES

10. Would public land that is being earmarked for private and 'Social Housing’ be better utilised for Public Housing? 

A. YES

Additional comments welcome and will be published.

"Thank you for your email, I found it very interesting and enlightening as I was not aware of the difference in nuance and outcome between Social and Public housing.

Kind Regards,
Anne Makhijani "   

Thanks from

FRIENDS OF PUBLIC HOUSING VIC

DEFEND AND EXTEND PUBLIC HOUSING

HANDS OFF PUBLIC HOUSING

EM SAGE - INDEPENDENT CANDIDATE FOR YARRA

 EM SAGE RESPONDS TO OUR REPORT CARD

1. Do you support Public Housing as an integral part of the housing mix?

 

   A. Yes

 
2. In Victoria, Public Housing as distinct from Community Housing, makes up 2.7% of all housing.
    Is this too high? Is this too low?

 

    A. Much too low!

 
3. Is Public Housing the best model for preventing and addressing homelessness?

 

    A. I believe so, yes.

4. Have you or anyone in your family or friendship circle ever been homeless?

 

A. No. But I grew up in a low income household in a regional area, where there was little in the way of Government services and support.   

 
5. Do you think the language regarding the various housing models should be more transparent?

 

A. Absolutely. Words can, and are frequently used to obfuscate or misrepresent reality. 

 
6. Do you think the issue of Public Housing versus Community Housing has been sufficiently discussed in the public domain?

 

A. No. I believe we need to look at ways we can get the media more engaged so we can bring this issue to the forefront of public debate. 

 
7. Should public tenants and those eligible for public housing be sufficiently informed of the differences between  Community and Public Housing and of their rights and protections?

 

A. Yes. 

8. Do you oppose the transferring of Public Housing stock to Community Housing corporations?

 

A. Absolutely. 

 
9. Do you support a significant build of Public Housing in your area to address homelessness?

 

A. Yes. 

 

10. Would public land that is being earmarked for private and 'Social Housing’ be better utilised for Public Housing?

 

A. Yes. 

 

Additional Comments welcome and will be published 

 

"Thanks so much for this email and for educating me on the issues associated with public housing. You have an advocate in me!"

Thanks from 

Friends of Public Housing Vic.

Defend and Extend Public Housing

Hands Off Public Housing

DAVE LEE -GREENS CANDIDATE - DAREBIN COUNCIL

DAVE LEE RESPONDS TO OUR REPORT CARD

1. Do you support Public Housing as an integral part of the housing mix? 

A. YES

2. In Victoria, Public Housing as distinct from Community Housing, makes up 2.7% of all housing.
  Is this too high? Is this too low? 

A. I don't know. I would refer to subject matter experts on this.

3. Is Public Housing the best model for preventing and addressing homelessness? 

A. YES

4. Have you or anyone in your family or friendship circle ever been homeless? 

A. NO

5. Do you think the language regarding the various housing models should be more transparent? 

A. YES

 
6. Do you think the issue of Public Housing versus Community Housing has been sufficiently discussed in the public domain? 

A. NO

7. Should public tenants and those eligible for public housing be sufficiently informed of the differences between  Community and Public Housing and of their rights and protections? 

A.YES

8. Do you oppose the transferring of Public Housing stock to Community Housing corporations?

 A.YES

 
9. Do you support a significant build of Public Housing in your area to address homelessness? 

A. YES

 
10. Would public land that is being earmarked for private and 'Social Housing’ be better utilised for Public Housing? 

A. Land that is earmarked for Social Housing would be better utilised for Public Housing. I think putting Public Housing on land earmarked for private housing, would be on a case-by-case basis.

Regards

Dave Lee, 

Candidate for NE ward in Darebin.

With thanks

Friends of Public Housing Vic

Defend and Extend Public Housing

Hands Off Public Housing.

ROSEMARY LEVIN - ANIMAL JUSTICE PARTY - KNOX

ROSEMARY LAVIN RESPONDS TO OUR REPORT CARD.

1. Do you support Public Housing as an integral part of the housing mix?

A.Most certainly, especially as we attempt to recover from a debilitating pandemic which has left many more homeless, bewildered and frightened.

2. In Victoria, Public Housing as distinct from Community Housing, makes up 2.7% of all housing.
  Is this too high? Is this too low?

A. 2.7% is too low.  According to a Knox City Council report from 2016, Knox had ~24% homeless people per 10,000 population. The figure would be much higher now.  This is a matter requiring the most urgent attention as it affects many children as well as many more vulnerable people with mental illness, the aged, those escaping domestic violence and so on.

3. Is Public Housing the best model for preventing and addressing homelessness?

A. There are many causes of homelessness: affordable housing, family violence and mental illness being the main ones made up of asylum seekers, refugees, indigenous people and women (especially those over 55 years of age). There are also ex-prisoners and young adults leaving state care needing assistance.  Every person listed is in a state of vulnerability that needs more, not less, care.
 
Public housing is vital but, as this report shows, there is a desperate need for various other support programs as well.  I would like to see more use of half-way houses, for those leaving prisons, state care and for those with mental health concerns.

The report calls for a legislative change to increase the age of those leaving state care - there could also be a call for foster care for young adults transitioning from state care to independence.

All levels of government need to address all of these issues which will require a great deal of funding, but the benefits will outweigh the cost.    

I would also like to see more dialogue with those in need to hear what they need, their dreams and wishes. I say this because I believe there is room for eco-friendly solutions such as tiny houses which will cost less, be less environmentally destructive and could be set up as a communal situation with a communal vegetable garden that will not only sustain those living there but could also become a minor source of income. We all know the benefits of gardening, especially for those who are lonely, dealing with mental health difficulties and so on.

4. Have you or anyone in your family or friendship circle ever been homeless?

A. I have known many homeless people coming from South Africa and as a teacher in Fish Hoek, Cape Town. My home was situated between 2 "townships".  While many children I taught lived in these townships, I would never call their living conditions a home. Other than that I have only witnessed those doing it rough in various cities I have lived in.  It is heartbreaking to witness and leaves me feeling helpless, guilty, sad, frustrated and angry.  The SBS program "Filthy rich and homeless" was a great educational and eye opening series which should be compulsory viewing for all politicians!

5. Do you think the language regarding the various housing models should be more transparent?

I absolutely think the language regarding housing models should be transparent.  There should be no profits being made by pretending to be one thing when in fact this is untrue. Where there is no transparency there will be corruption which has no place in a decent society, one we all aspire to live in.

6. Do you think the issue of Public Housing versus Community Housing has been sufficiently discussed in the public domain?

A. No, I most definitely do not believe this issue has been discussed at all.  I realise that public housing is state owned while community housing is run by a not-for-profit organisation but I think your email highlights the fact that most people (I believe) think both are one and the same.  There definitely needs more public education regarding the differences in these terms and what the ultimate benefits for the homeless are and where there is great need for change.

7. Should public tenants and those eligible for public housing be sufficiently informed of the differences between  Community and Public Housing and of their rights and protections?

Without a doubt. I believe there is a great need for improved support services regarding information, legal assistance, welfare checks, carers, vet checks for their companion animals, assistance with food, clothing, toiletries, bedding etc.

I would like to see "Meals on Wheels" to include food for companion animals and as many public housing facilities as possible to accommodate companion animals too.

8. Do you oppose the transferring of Public Housing stock to Community Housing corporations?
 

I do oppose this sort of transfer as it removes state responsibility and transfers the responsibility to not-for-profit organisations.  The costing will then be impacted and affordability, eligibility and legal parameters changed.  The state needs to keep ownership of existing public housing and put more funding into creating more options state wide.  

9. Do you support a significant build of Public Housing in your area to address homelessness?

I do support a significant build of public housing in my area as long as the buildings are much more eco-friendly, environmentally conscious and blend in with the surroundings. I believe public housing needs more, not less, green areas where tenants can grow communal vegetable gardens, wall gardens, roof gardens and similar variations.

10. Would public land that is being earmarked for private and 'Social Housing’ be better utilised for Public Housing?
 

A. As we know, homelessness is on the increase and there is already insufficient public housing so I do believe that public land earmarked for private and "social housing" would be better utilised for public housing. 

Further comments welcomed and will be published.

"Thank you for bringing these injustices to my attention.  I am always appalled at any lack of care given to vulnerable communities, where their needs and voices are ignored and unheard.  As a result of the information you have given me, I most certainly will support any efforts to improve council support for these most vulnerable people and their companion animals, should they have any.

 
Thank you for clarifying this issue for me and for allowing me to respond to your questions. I am extremely concerned with the biodiversity crisis we are facing and would like all future development projects to protect existing ecosystems and build sensitively within the natural surroundings.  Whether elected or not, I will be paying close attention to proposed developments in Knox and will enquire about public housing wherever possible while also ensuring the health of other vulnerable residents, companion animals and our urban wildlife, is also taken into account.

Yours sincerely,

Rosemary Lavin
Animal Justice Party Committee Member
Candidate for Dinsdale Ward, Knox City Council
"I'm giving my vote to the animals"

 Thanks from

Friends of Public Housing Vic

Defend and Extend Public Housing

Hands Off Public Housing

SUE BOLTON MORELAND TEAM RESPONDS TO OUR SUPPORT CARD.

Sue Bolton Moreland Team responds to FOPHV's Report Card

Q1. Do you support Public Housing as an integral part of the housing mix? 

 

A. Yes

 

Q2. In Victoria, Public Housing as distinct from Community Housing, makes up 2.7% of all housing.
       Is this too high? Is this too low? 

 

A. It is too low. We need a massive expansion in the amount of public housing.

 

Q3. Is Public Housing the best model for preventing and addressing homelessness?  

 

A. Yes

 

4. Have you or anyone in your family or friendship circle ever been homeless?  

 

A. Yes

 

Q5. Do you think the language regarding the various housing models should be more transparent?

 

A. Yes. The use of the terms "social housing" and "community housing" are designed to confuse people. A lot of people assume that social housing means public housing.

6. Do you think the issue of Public Housing versus Community Housing has been sufficiently discussed in the public domain? 

 

A.I don't think many people know the difference between public housing and community housing.

 
7. Should public tenants and those eligible for public housing be sufficiently informed of the differences between Community and Public Housing and of their rights and protections?  

 

A. Public housing tenants should be better informed of their rights in public housing and their rights in community housing so that they understand that they have more rights in public housing.

 

8. Do you oppose the transferring of Public Housing stock to Community Housing corporations? 

 

A.We are strongly opposed to the transfer of public housing to community housing associations and we have been involved in campaigns against these sorts of transfers. 

 
9. Do you support a significant build of Public Housing in your area to address homelessness? 

 

A. We think this is urgent to have a massive public housing building program.

 

10. Would public land that is being earmarked for private and 'Social Housing’ be better utilised for Public Housing? 

 

A. Yes. Public land is best used for public housing.

Further comments welcome and will be published.

"These comments below reflect the views of our team for the Moreland council elections. 

It is called the Sue Bolton Moreland Team because we are a united ticket of Socialist Alliance and community independents.

Our candidates are:

North-East Ward - Sue Bolton & Meghan Street

South Ward - Pauline Galvin & Jacob Andrewartha

North-West Ward - Monica Harte"

 

Thanks from

Friends of Public Housing Vic

Defend and Extend Public Housing

Hands Off Public Housing

LIZ WALSH -VIC SOCIALIST CANDIDATE -MARIBYRNONG COUNCIL

LIZ WALSH RESPONDS TO OUR REPORT CARD

1. Do you support Public Housing as an integral part of the housing mix?

Yes, most definitely.

2. In Victoria, Public Housing as distinct from Community Housing, makes up 2.7% of all housing.
  Is this too high? Is this too low?

It is criminally low. We need a massive expansion in public housing in this state and an investment in improving the condition of public housing. Public housing is better than community housing. I oppose the "public housing renewal scheme". The privatisation of public housing land will be a loss we experience for many generations.

3. Is Public Housing the best model for preventing and addressing homelessness?

Yes. There is greater security of tenure in public housing than community housing and there are greater controls on the cost of rent. The private rental market is too expensive for many low income people. Domestic violence is the largest driver of homelessness of women and their children because there is not enough public and emergency housing.

4. Have you or anyone in your family or friendship circle ever been homeless?

I have not been homeless. But Ive had friends who are homeless, not sleeping rough, but who have very insecure housing (couch surfing) or are housed by Berry St etc.

5. Do you think the language regarding the various housing models should be more transparent?

Yes, it's a problem that social housing is now used interchangeably with public housing by government and many housing advocates.

6. Do you think the issue of Public Housing versus Community Housing has been sufficiently discussed in the public domain?

Not at all. As a councillor i would make it clear that when i talk about public housing, i mean public housing..

7. Should public tenants and those eligible for public housing be sufficiently informed of the differences between Community and Public Housing and of their rights and protections?

Of course.

8. Do you oppose the transferring of Public Housing stock to Community Housing corporations?

Yes, 100%

9. Do you support a significant build of Public Housing in your area to address homelessness?

Yes, the Victorian Socialists are for a massive expansion in public housing. We need to build more stock. The pitiful amounts proposed by state Labor is laughable.


10. Would public land that is being earmarked for private and 'Social Housing’ be better utilised for Public Housing?

Yes. As a councillor, i would work to earmark land in my area for more public housing and campaign for that to happen.

YARRA CR STEPHEN JOLLY RESPONDS TO OUR REPORT CARD

 

Q1. Do you support Public Housing as an integral part of the housing mix?

A. Yes

 

Q2. In Victoria, Public Housing as distinct from Community Housing, makes up 2.7% of all housing. Is this too high? Is this too low?  

A. Too low

 

Q3. Is Public Housing the best model for preventing and addressing homelessness?

A. Yes

 

4. Have you or anyone in your family or friendship circle ever been homeless?

A. Yes

 

5. Do you think the language regarding the various housing models should be more transparent?

A. Yes

 

6. Do you think the issue of Public Housing versus Community Housing has been sufficiently discussed in the public domain?

A. No

 

Q7. Should public tenants and those eligible for public housing be sufficiently informed of the differences between  Community and Public Housing and of their rights and protections?

A. Yes

 

Q8. Do you oppose the transferring of Public Housing stock to Community Housing corporations?

A. Yes

 

Q9. Do you support a significant build of Public Housing in your area to address homelessness?

A.Yes

 

Q10. Would public land that is being earmarked for private and 'Social Housing’ be better utilised for Public Housing

A. Yes

 

Any further comments you wish to make are welcome, and will be published.

"I have been the voice of public housing tenants in my area on Yarra  Council for 16 years. I led the successful fight against the then Liberal State government from selling off the public open green space on the Fitzroy and North Richmond public housing estates. I am currently involved in the ongoing  campaign on Yarra’s estates for adequate Covid-protection for resident, for the heritage listing of the Fitzroy estate to better protect it from a sell-off and numerous day-to-day issues from cockroaches, to broken laundries etc etc."

Thanks from 

Friends of Public Housing Vic

Defend and Extend Public Housing

Hands Off Public Housing