FOPHV -ALLIES AND SUPPORTERS -VIEWPOINTS

Wouldn't you think that with so much visible homelessness, destitution and human misery on our streets, that there'd be more voices saying "Hold on a minute - we really need to look into what is happening to public housing" !?

The lack of openness and transparency around this issue is an indictment on our so-called democracy.

To quote a homeless person, forced onto the streets by the unequal distribution of resources in this prosperous country - "Australia the Lucky Country!? The Hypocritical Country more like it."

Following are viewpoints from our Pro-Public Housing allies and activists.

DR JOE TOSCANO
DEFEND AND EXTEND PUBLIC HOUSING
PUBLIC INTERESTS BEFORE CORPORATE INTEREST - PIBCI

"Housing affordability will be the single most important issue Australians will have to grapple with in 2017. Increasing numbers of Australians living on the streets, in their cars and couch surfing is only the tip of an iceberg that is having a significant impact on an increasing number of Australians.

The current malaise can be directly attributed to the subcontracting of the public housing sector by governments to both the non-profit and for profit private sector.

The dismantling of a viable public housing sector by governments of all political hues, the support given to the privatised “community” and “social” housing sector by organisations that have traditionally agitated for a well-resourced and expanding public housing sector, has implications for most Australians.

The privatisation and dismantling of the public housing sector removes what little competition exists in the marketplace to keep rents and housing prices at reasonable levels.

A strong, well-financed public housing sector that caters for people on low incomes, not just those in very desperate circumstances, puts downward pressure on rents (especially at the lower end of the market) and helps to stabilise and drop prices for entry level housing.

A strong public housing sector, although bad news for property investors who use investor friendly negative gearing legislation to maximise their profits at the public expense, is good news for Australians on social security benefits and wage earners who have been priced out of the property market."
           
 -------------------------------------------

HOWARD MAROSI
FOPHV- DEFEND AND EXTEND PUBLIC HOUSING.

The Victorian state government has signalled its intention to privatise much of our public housing, by giving it to the private sector – also known as “social”, “community” or “affordable” housing. This part of the housing sector is run by churches, charities and corporations.

Public housing tenants and the homeless want to stay in public housing. Rents are set at 25 percent of income, they have security of tenure, and all applicants are accepted (albeit after a very long wait) if their income is below the required level. None of this is true of the privatised alternative.

Already in Victoria, the titles to thousands of public housing units have been given away. Many thousands more are managed by the private sector. In its last year, Denis Napthine’s Liberal Party government announced a plan to give away 12,000 public housing units. It was not able to proceed, being booted out in 2014.

After the state election, Martin Foley, housing minister in the new Andrews government, also cited a plan to hand titles or management rights of more public housing units to the private sector. However, exact numbers remain unspecified.

A new campaign group has formed to fight the privatisation of public housing and call for more to be built. Defend and Extend Public Housing has already organised a series of protests with the next action planned for Wed 8 February -12 pm Parliament House Steps.

                              Wed 8. March    - 12pm Parliament House Steps

                              Topic for discussion - Destruction of the walk-ups - low-rise public housing                                Gentrification in Disguise.

---------------------------------------------

JEREMY DIXON
FRIENDS OF PUBLIC HOUSING VIC

"The Liberals are against Public Housing in that they believe the market should solve all economic problems.They would abolish Public Housing if they could and will go as near to that as political realities will allow. The ALP is still under the spell of Blair type economics. They think that the market must have a place in housing provision because it has become an article of faith that markets are inherently more efficient- an article of faith impervious to empirical evidence! But the market should be socially responsible and so we have these bizarre hybrids - part charity, part businesses - often with the worst attributes of both combined- the Community Housing Organisations. By contrast Friends of Public Housing Vic does not believe that the market can or should solve all economic problems. The government should intervene to solve the housing shortage in the most straight-forward and efficient way - by retaining the public housing we have and building more to meet the demand."
                                           
 --------------------------------------

It is ironic, but the Liberals seem to be less willing to hand over the titles of Public Housing than Labor - not because they support Public Housing - but because it makes bad economic sense to do so. When LNP Premier Newman in Queensland unveiled plans in 2013 to transfer the management of 90% of public housing to the private sector-  the response from Community Housing Organisations was 'disappointment' that the Queensland Government had 'stopped short of title transfer.' Thankfully they did- otherwise the subsequent ALP Palaszczuk government would have found the decision virtually impossible to reverse.

It says a lot about the bias of the media in this country, that I could find no newspaper articles that supported Qld ALP's Minister De Brenni's gutsy decision to scrap privatisation plans for Logan - a massive multi million dollar project. No support for reinstating Human Rights to the state's most vulnerable people and for defending and protecting public housing- now and for future generations...??  According to the article in 'the Conversation', the Palaszczuk government's staunch anti-privatisation position on Public Housing is inconsistent with Labor policies elsewhere...

Martin Foley has stated that Vic Labor is prepared to hand over the titles of Public Housing to Community Housing. CHOs -Community Housing Organisations already own and/or manage over 18,000 properties in Victoria. This includes former publicly owned properties. In their submission to the Victorian Budget 2016/17 they are calling for the titles of 12,000 public housing properties to be given to them as well as millions of dollars in funding.

Will our politicians continue to fail homeless and desperate people with short-sighted, undemocratic and irreversible housing policies?  Remember the fiasco of the rorted National Rental Affordability Scheme ( NRAS ) - touted as the big solution to the country's housing ills by Labor and the Greens?  


These housing policies are continuing to create an entrenched underclass and an escalation of  homelessness. 

-----------------------------------------------
MARK TOWLER
EXPERTS BY EXPERIENCE

"Social Housing. Community Housing. Public Housing.  ???
SPOT THE DIFFERENCE NOW - but be quick!
BEFORE ALP Housing Minister Martin Foley demolishes public housing and sells (or simply gives) land title of STATE-OWNED PROPERTY to the Community Housing Federation of Victoria -
CHFV."

------------------------------------------------
Post by 'UGLY'
FRIENDS OF  PUBLIC HOUSING VIC

"Public Housing is state owned and government controlled on behalf of the taxpayer.
All this 'social housing' and 'community housing' is basically bullshit.

I was given the choice to enter either community housing or public housing and I chose
Public Housing. I want to know in my old age that I have a place to call my own- a place I cannot be kicked out of. I need security in my old age. That is only guaranteed in public housing.
If they keep going down the path of privatising public housing, homelessness we will go through the roof !
Labor's decision to demolish the walk-ups should be strongly opposed by the tenants themselves, the local surrounding communities, councils and the Trade Union movement. Any walk-ups in such a bad state that they need demolishing - a very small minority- should be done on the understanding that all of the public tenants return home. We know that this has not been the case in the past. While they are about it, they should build many more units onsite to be used as genuine public housing."

MARTINA MACEY
COMMUNITY HOUSING SUPPORT GROUP
MARTINA IS A COMMUNITY HOUSING TENANT OPPOSING THE PRIVATISATION OF PUBLIC HOUSING

"It is disgraceful what they are doing - right across the country. Community Housing Organisations are all individual businesses with different policies and procedures. People need to wake up to this.

Some Community Housing Organisations don't give a damn - people need to realise that too. Labor doesn't care what happens to people who will become more vulnerable to homelessness.

Homelessness has already risen because of the transferring of public housing to Community Housing Organisations. The amount of money Labor is throwing at the problem of homelessness or Domestic Violence is achieving results that are just a drop in the ocean. It is money which would have been far better spent fixing public housing and starting a re-building program.What we need is an increase in housing stock."

---------------------------------------------
Sources
 https://cabinet.qld.gov.au/documents/2013/jun/housing%202020/Attachments/Attachment%20-%20Housing2020Strategy.PDF

https://theconversation.com/ditching-logans-public-private-regeneration-sets-queensland-back-on-social-and-affordable-housing-62941